| QNAP TS-419P II NAS Network Storage Server |
| Reviews - Featured Reviews: Network | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Written by Bruce Normann | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tuesday, 01 November 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
QNAP TS-419P II NAS Server Review
Manufacturer: QNAP Systems, Inc. Full disclosure: The product used in this review was supplied by QNAP Systems The official name for this type of device is "Network Attached Storage", but in today's environment, I prefer to think of it as "Connected Storage". With the ability to directly access your data via cloud services or with your favorite mobile device, it's increasingly about connectedness more than the ability to store files and transmit them over 1000BASE-T in your home or your workspace. All that and much more is readily available in a Network Attached Storage server from industry stalwart, QNAP. The TS-419P II Turbo NAS uses an upgraded, energy-efficient 2.0 GHz Marvell ARM-based processor with 512 MB of DDR3 system memory to drive this storage server. Dual Gigabit Ethernet network ports allow failover safety and teaming, while four SATA 3Gb/s drive bays offer single disk, JBOD, and RAID 0/1/5/6/10 configurations. Benchmark Reviews recently examined the QNAP TS-659 Pro II Turbo NAS in detail, and now we compare the performance of this smaller, less expensive unit against several other network attached storage servers. The TS-419P II NAS server is the next logical step up from a two-bay device. While it's a larger unit than many other NAS devices, it's not the biggest. It fits into the middle ground where high-tech households and smaller businesses operate. If you need both capacity and redundancy, you need to implement RAID 5 at a minimum, and that means at least three disks. If you want to go to RAID 6 or RAID 10, you need a minimum of four disks, with two spindles completely occupied by providing multiple levels of redundancy for your data. Now you're left with only two drive bays worth of storage capacity, and a four-bay device like the TS-419P II is really the bare minimum for a high availability NAS appliance.
Three features still dominate the discussion of network storage hardware: data capacity, data security, and data transfer speed, but in the last couple of years there has been a growing emphasis on the software side. The current crop of NAS devices offer a dizzying array of applications to help manage and distribute the data, and provide several new ways of accessing that data. In the past, this level of control and communication has been limited to the corporate world, because you needed an MSCSE to figure them out. Now they're available without having to keep a full IT staff on overhead. QNAP has always aimed for the high end of the NAS server market with performance and features such as dual Gigabit Ethernet with failover, a full range of RAID functionality, and a diverse, feature-rich user interface. Version 3.4 was a major upgrade to the QNAP software suite, and we have explored many of its outstanding features and capabilities in recent reviews. Version 3.5 was released a few weeks ago, and we will do a follow up in the near future, to see what's new there. Benchmark Reviews has tested a wide array of QNAP NAS products, ranging from the QNAP TS-119 NAS single-disk offering made for home users, to the Goliath QNAP TS-809 Pro 8-Bay NAS for the storage needs of large businesses. Most recently we tested the 6-bay TS-659 Pro II and the 2-bay TS-219P+ Turbo-NAS servers. Let's see how this 4-bay device compares to its big brothers and little sisters.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CPU |
Marvell 88F6282 processor ARM®v5TE Single Core 2.0 GHz, 256KB L2 Cache |
|
DRAM |
512 MB DDR3-1066 DRAM |
|
Flash Memory |
16MB |
|
HDD Form Factor |
Accepts 2.5" or 3.5" SATA |
|
HDD Tray |
4 x Hot-swappable |
|
LAN Port |
2x Gigabit RJ-45 Ethernet port |
|
LED Indicators |
HDD 1, HDD 2, HDD3, HDD$, LAN, eSATA |
|
USB |
4 x USB 2.0 port (Front: 1; Back: 3) |
|
eSATA |
2 x eSATA port (Back) |
|
Buttons |
System Power, USB One-Touch-Backup, Reset |
|
LCD Panel |
Mono-LCD display with backlight |
|
Dimensions |
177 (H) x 180 (W) x 235 (D) mm |
|
Weight |
Net weight: 3.0 kg (6.61 lbs) |
|
Sound Level (dB) |
35.6 dB-Standby, 36.7 dB-Operation |
|
Power Consumption (W) |
Sleep mode: 13W |
|
Temperature |
0~40°C |
|
Humidity |
0~95% R.H. |
|
Power Supply |
External Supply: 100-240V AC, 50/60Hz, 96W |
|
Secure Design |
K-lock security slot for theft prevention |
|
VGA |
N/A |
|
Fan |
1 x axial fan (90 mm, 12V DC, PWM type) |
I mentioned earlier that QNAP has a very extensive set of features built into the operating software, but maybe I should have warned you. The S/W feature list is HUGE. Honestly, a lot of us spend the majority of our time analyzing hardware (yeah, I'm guilty...), but when you see all the capability that a modern NAS server can provide, it's pretty amazing. Let's take a long, detailed look, shall we?
QNAP TS-419P II Software Specifications
Software Specifications
Operating System
- Embedded Linux
Supported Operating System
- Microsoft Windows 2000, XP, Vista (32/ 64 bit), Windows 7 (32/ 64 bit), Server 2003/ 2008
- Apple Mac OS X
- Linux & Unix
Supported Web Browsers
- Internet Explorer 7,8, or 9
- Firefox 3 or later
- Safari 3 & 4 or later
- Google Chrome
Multilingual Support
- Chinese (Traditional & Simplified), Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Turkish.
File System
- Internal HDD: EXT3, EXT4
- External HDD: EXT3, EXT4, NTFS, FAT32, HFS+
Networking
- TCP/IP (IPv4 & IPv6: Dual Stack)
- Dual Gigabit LAN with Jumbo Frame
- Multi-IP Settings, Port Trunking/NIC Teaming (Modes: Balance-rr, Active Backup, Balance XOR, Broadcast, IEEE 802.3ad/Link Aggregation, Balance-tlb and Balance-alb)
- DHCP Client, DHCP Server
- Protocols: CIFS/SMB, AFP (3.1), NFS, FTP, HTTP, HTTPS, Telnet, SSH, iSCSI and SNMP.
- Network Service Discovery (UPnP, Bonjour)
- USB Wi-Fi 802.11n Adapter Support (Optional Purchase)
Network File Sharing
- CIFS/SMB (Plus DFS Support)
- AFP
- NFS
- FTP
- WebDAV
Backup Solution
- USB One Touch Backup (Import/Export)
- Apple Time Machine Support with Backup Management
- Block-level Remote Replication
- Work as Both Rsync Server & Client
- Supports Encrypted Replication between QNAP NAS Servers
- Back up to External Storage Device
- Back up to Cloud Storage (Amazon S3 & ElephantDrive)
Security
- IP Filter & Policy-based Automatic IP Blocking
- Network Access Protection with Auto-blocking
- Encrypted Access: HTTPS, FTP with SSL/TLS (Explicit), SSH/SFTP (admin only), Encrypted Remote Replication (Rsync over SSH)
- CIFS Host Access Control for Shared Folders
- Importable SSL Certificate
- Instant Alert via Email, SMS, and LCD
- Military-level encryption for external drive (AES-128, AES-192, and AES-256)
Disk Management
- Single Disk, JBOD, RAID 0 / 1 / 5 / 5+Hot Spare / 6 / 6+ Hot Spare / 10, 10+Hot Spare
- Online RAID Capacity Expansion & Online RAID Level Migration
- Bad Block Scan & HDD S.M.A.R.T
- Global Spare Drive
- RAID Recovery
- Bitmap Support
- Supports ISO Mounting (via Web File Manager)
iSCSI (IP SAN)
- iSCSI Target
- Multi-LUNs per Target
- Up to 256 LUNs
- Supports LUN Mapping & Masking
- Supports SPC-3 Persistent Reservation
- Supports MPIO & MC/S
- Virtual Disk Drive (via iSCSI Initiator)
- Stack Chaining Master
- Max. Virtual Disk Drives: 8
- iSCSI LUN Snapshot/Backup
Power Management
- Wake on LAN
- Scheduled Power on/off (Max 15 settings)
- Automatic Power on after Power Recovery
Access Right Management
- Max User Accounts: 4,096
- Max Groups: 512
- Max. Share Folder: 512
- LDAP Directory Service
- Batch Creating Users
- Import/Export Users
- User Quota Management
- Subfolder Permissions Support
Windows AD Support
- Domain Users Login via CIFS/SMB, AFP, FTP and Web File Manager
- Supports NTLMv2 Authentication
Web Administration
- AJAX-based User Interface
- HTTP/HTTPS Connections
- Alert Notification (Email & SMS)
- Smart Fan Control
- DDNS & MyCloudNAS Remote Access
- SNMP (v2 & v3)
- UPS Support with SNMP Management (USB)
- Supports Network UPS
- Resource Monitor
- Network Recycle Bin for CIFS/SMB and AFP
- Comprehensive Logs (Events & Connection)
- Real-time Online User List
- Syslog Client
- Firmware Update with Live Update Notification
- Backup and Restore System Settings
- Restore to Factory Default
Applications
- Web File Manager
- Multimedia Station
- Download Station
- Surveillance Station
- iTunes Server
- UPnP Media Server
- Apache Web Server
- MySQL Server
- Syslog Server
- RADIUS Server
- Backup Server
- Anti-Virus
- TFTP Server
QMobile App
- QMobile for iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, Android devices
- Third Party UPnP Media Player
QPKG
- Web Applications
- Joomla!
- phpMyAdmin
- WordPress
- AjaXplorer
- vtigerCRM
- GLPI
- Magento
- GLPI
- P2P Applications
- MLDonkey (eMule)
- SABnzbd+
- NZBGet
- Server Applications
- Asterisk
- XDove (Mail Server)
- OpenLDAP
- Media Server
- Squeezebox Server
- IceStation
- Misc.
- Optware IPKG
- Python
- iStat
Powerful All-in-one server
File Server
- File Sharing across Windows, Mac, and Linux/UNIX
- Protocols: CIFS/SMB, AFP(3.2), NFS, FTP, HTTP, HTTPS
- QNAP Web File Manager
- Supports ISO Mounting
- Direct File Viewing via Google Doc
FTP Server
- FTP over SSL/TLS (Explicit)
- Max Concurrent Connections: 256
- FXP Supported
- Passive FTP Port Range Control
- FTP Bandwidth & Connection Control
- Unicode Support
Web Server
- HTTP/ HTTPS Connections
- Supports WebDAV Connection
- Support Virtual Host
- Importable SSL Certificate
Database Server
- Built-in MySQL Server
- Web-based Management via phpMyAdmin (QPKG)
Backup Server
- Remote Replication Server (over Rsync)
- Apple Time Machine Support
- QNAP Client Backup Application-NetBak Replicator
- 3rd Party Backup Software Support: Acronis True Image, CA BrightStor, ARCserve Backup, EMC Retrospect, Symantec Backup Exec, LaCie SilverKeeper
iTunes Server
- Audio and Video Sharing
- Smart Playlist for iTunes Client (Windows & Mac OS)
Printer Server
- Network Printer Sharing (USB)
- Max Printers: 3
- Supports Internet Printing Protocol
- Supports Apple Bonjour Printing
- Advanced Printer Management
- Print Jobs Display and Management
- Access Right Control (IP & Domain Names)
Multimedia Station
- Supports Photo, Audio and Video
- Image Slide Show and Rotation
- Automatic & Schedule Thumbnail Generation for Easy Browsing
- Display Photo Details from EXIF: Date, Exposure Time, Aperture, etc.
- Display Audio Details from ID3 Tag: Album Cover, Title, Artist, Album, etc.
- Access Authority Management
- Multimedia (Video & Audio) Streaming
- Supports Cooliris
- Supports Web Publishing (Facebook, MySpace, MSN Live, Twitter, Plurk, Blogger)
- Share Photos by Email
- Supported Formats:
- Photo - JPG/JPEG, GIF, PNG
- Audio - MP3
- Video
- Playback: FLV, MPEG-4 Video (H.264 + AAC)
- Transcode: AVI, M4V, MPG/MPEG, RM/RMVB, WMV
- QNAP Exclusive iPhone & Android App - QMobile
Download Station
- PC-less BitTorrent, FTP, HTTP Download (up to 500 Tasks)
- BitTorrent Download
- Supports TCP/ UDP Tracker Protocol
- Schedule Download
- Configurable Port Range
- Bandwidth Control
- UPnP NAT Port Forwarding
- Subscribe to RSS Feeds
- RSS Download (Broadcatching)
- Selectable Download Files
- HTTP/ FTP Download
- Configurable Saving Directory
- Bulk Download with Wildcard Setting
- RapidShare Download Support
- QNAP Download Management Software: QGet
- For Both Windows & Mac OS
- Manage the Download Tasks of Multiple QNAP NAS Remotely over LAN or WAN
Surveillance Station
- Supports 4 IP Cameras (Optional Purchase) for Network Surveillance
Besides the core features available in the QNAP v3.4 firmware, further capabilities are available in the QPKG Center Software Expansion. Let's take a quick look at some ways to extend the functionality of this server even further.
QPKG Center Software Expansion
Explore the Unlimited Possibilities of Your NAS with QPKG
The Network Attached Storage (NAS) used to refer to a basic network storage device for simple data sharing but now with the high performance SoC and the advantage in power-saving design, it is redefined as a powerful embedded system that allows the possibilities of offering numerous fascinating applications. Over the past years, QNAP has successfully developed a series of All-in-One NAS servers for power users and business users providing a wide variety of software applications. Besides those QNAP provides, many other software packages are also developed in Linux open source community that power users are able to install them on their NAS to further enrich the functions. However, this is only limited to those advanced users or software developers who are more familiar with Linux systems. In order to let majority of general QNAP NAS users to also utilize their NAS servers with those software packages already developed by the open source community, QPKG platform and development framework is then introduced by QNAP.
Inspired from the powerful software package management system in Linux (yum, dpkg, etc.), but unlike those running in the modern PCs today, QPKG is designed and fine-tuned for running on Linux embedded systems like NAS along with many popular software packages ready for install. Besides, in order to publish your software in our official repository all the software packages will be verified by QNAP to prevent from others to embed malicious codes for system intrusion or potential risks of data damage. Therefore QNAP NAS users may enjoy these software packages developed by the community in a safe way through an installation method as easy as firmware update just like you would install/uninstall software in the Windows environment without the need to go through the complicated process.
QNAP has introduced some popular QPKG software packages as the demonstration purpose. Below are the quick introductions on each of them:
MLDonkey (eMule)
MLDonkey (eMule) is a door to the 'donkey' network, a decentralized network used to exchange big files on the Internet and present most features of the basic Windows donkey client. (e.g., eMule)
Slim Server on Turbo Station (with SqueezeCenter 7)
Squeeze Center is the server software from Slim Device that manages common digital audio formats (.mp3, .flac, .ogg, etc.) and streams them to its players. Slim Server On Turbo Station (SSOTS) developed by flipflip is an add-on to the Turbo Station's firmware which provides the environment to run Squeeze Center 7 on it.
Optware Ipkg (Itsy Package Management System)
Ipkg, or the Itsy Package Management System, is a lightweight package management system designed for embedded devices. It is used in the Unslung operating system for the Linksys NSLU2, in OpenWRT, OpenMoko, Gumstix, iPAQ and now on QNAP NAS too.
SABnzbd+
SABnzbd+ is a multi-platform binary newsgroup downloader written in Python language. The program works in the background and simplifies the downloading, verifying and extracting of files from Usenet. SABnzbd+ does not search for files, instead NZB files (similar to .torrent files, but for Usenet) are fed to SABnzbd+ from sites like newzbin.com, binsearch.info and tvnzb.com (Requires prior installation of Python)
Python
Python is a general-purpose, high-level programming language. Its design philosophy emphasizes programmer productivity and code readability.
WordPress
WordPress is a free, open-source personal publishing system that allows you to easily create a complex blog, or web log, on your site. Written in PHP and supported by a MySQL database, WordPress offers intuitive administrative tools and sophisticated design features that make it easy to develop and integrate a personal or professional blog on your site.
Joomla CMS
Joomla! is a free, open source content management system for publishing content on the world wide web and intranets. The system includes features such as page caching to improve performance, RSS feeds, printable versions of pages, news flashes, blogs, polls, website searching, and language internationalization. Benchmark Reviews is built from the Joomla! CMS.
phpMyAdmin
phpMyAdmin is an open source tool written in PHP intended to handle the administration of MySQL over the Internet. Currently it can create and drop databases, create/drop/alter tables, delete/edit/add fields, execute any SQL statement, and manage keys on fields.
xDove Email Server
XDove named after XMail & Dovecot the 2 open source offerings that are combined to provide a complete set of Email server functionalities which is one-click installable on your QNAP NAS. XDove not only provides SMTP, POP3 and IMAP services, it also comes with a variety of features like multiple virtual domains and accounts, AJAX webmail with extended functionalities including personal folders, address book, calendar and real-time chat among users under the same mail domain. Besides the mail services XDove offers scheduled backup and restore of your mailboxes from multiple domains which gives you an extra protection on the top of your RAID data redundancy.
AjaXplorer
AjaXplorer is a file explorer for remotely managing files on a web server or operation as a simple file-sharing system. Its rich layout and actions make it easily accessible to virtually any end-user. The AJAX based interface, providing streamlined and intuitive functionalities, similar to that of a standard file-system explorer on any operating system.
Software Expansion via QPKG Platform
The QPKG software package platform enables the users to maximize the usage of Turbo NAS by installing additional software packages developed from the users and community worldwide. This can be done by simple "download & install" clicking without going through any complicated process.
We've seen the COMPLETE ins and outs of the hardware and the software; now let's dive into the testing phase.
Network Terminology
Benchmark Reviews primarily uses metric data measurement for testing storage products, for anyone who is interested in learning the relevant history of this sore spot in the industry, I've included a small explanation below:
The basic unit data measurement is called a bit (one single binary digit). Computers use these bits, which are composed of ones and zeros, to communicate their contents. All files are stored as binary files, and translated into working files by the Operating System. This two number system is called a "binary number system". In comparison, the decimal number system has ten unique digits consisting of zero through nine. Essentially it boils down to differences between binary and metric measurements, because testing is deeply impacted without carefully separating the two. For example, the difference between the transfer time of a one-Gigabyte (1000 Megabytes) file is going to be significantly better than a true binary Gigabyte (referred to as a Gibibyte) that contains 1024 Megabytes. The larger the file used for data transfer, the bigger the difference will be.
Have you ever wondered why your 500 GB hard drive only has about 488 GB once it has been formatted? Most Operating Systems utilize the binary number system to express file data size, however the prefixes for the multiples are based on the metric system. So even though a metric "Kilo" equals 1,000, a binary "Kilo" equals 1,024. Are you confused yet? Don't be surprised, because even the most tech savvy people often mistake the two. Plainly put, the Kilobyte is expressed as 1000 bytes, but it is really comprised of 1,024 bytes.
Most network engineers are not fully aware that the IEC changed the way we calculate and name data chunks when they published the new International Standards back in December 1998. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) removed the old metric prefixes for multiples in binary code with new prefixes for binary multiples made up of only the first two letters of the metric prefixes and adding the first two letters of the word "binary". For example, instead of Megabyte (MB) or Gigabyte (GB), the new terms would be Mebibyte (MiB) or Gibibyte (GiB). While this is the new official IEC International Standard, it has not been widely adopted yet because it is either still unknown by institutions or not commonly used.
NAS Testing Methodology
All the NAS devices we test cannot accommodate all the different disk configurations, so our current test protocol has been based on two of the most popular setups: a basic (single) disk and RAID-5 configurations. Since this four-bay device easily supports RAID 5; I tested both disk modes this time. During initial setup, the NAS was upgraded to the latest v3.4 firmware by flashing the DOM with binary files on the included CD-ROM. The supplied firmware for the TS-419P II was v3.4.3 (0331T)
Connected directly to the Realtek 8112L Gigabit LAN controller in the test-bench system by a ten-foot CAT6 patch cable, the NAS product receives one test transfer followed by at least three timed transfers. Each test file was sent to the Western Digital Caviar Black 750GB (WD7502AAEX) hard drives installed in the NAS for a timed write test, and that same file was sent back to a Western Digital VelociRaptor 150GB 10,000 RPM (WD1500HLFS) hard drive in the test system to perform a read test. Each test was repeated several times, the high and low values were discarded and the remaining results were recorded and charted.
This is the start of NAS testing where we are going to exclusively use Windows 7 as the testing platform for the host system. The performance differences between Win7 and XP are huge, as we documented in our QNAP TS-259 Pro review. The adoption rate for Win 7 has been very high, and Benchmark Reviews has been using Win 7 in all of our other testing for some time now. It's definitely time to make the jump for NAS products.
The two transfer tests: read and write, were conducted on each NAS appliance using the 1 GB file and then a 10 GB file. Additionally, a second set of tests were conducted with Jumbo Frame enabled, i.e. the MTU value for the Ethernet controllers was increased from 1500 to 9000. All the NAS products tested to date in the Windows 7 environment have supported the Jumbo Frame configuration. I also include a baseline of sorts, which is the internal file transfer from the Corsair P64 SSD to the Western Digital 150GB VelociRaptor installed on the Intel P55 motherboard SATA connections, where the Intel P55 chipset provides the SATA 3Gb/s interface, and a Marvell 88SE9123 controller provides two ports of SATA 6Gb/s connections.
NAS Comparison Products
- QNAP TS-219P+ Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-259 Pro Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-659 Pro II Gigabit 6-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-419P II Gigabit 4-bay SATA NAS Server
Support Equipment
- (4) Western Digital Caviar Black WD7502AAEX 750GB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6Gb/s 3.5"
- 10-Foot Category-6 Solid Copper Shielded Twisted Pair Patch Cable
- 1 metric Gigabyte Test File (1 GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes)
- 10 metric Gigabyte Test File (10 GB = 10,000,000,000 bytes)
Test System
- Motherboard: ASUS P7P55D-E Pro (1002 BIOS)
- System Memory: 2x 2GB GSKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600MHz (7-8-7-24)
- Processor: Intel Core i5-750 (OC @ 4.0 GHz)
- CPU Cooler: Prolimatech Megahalems (Delta AFB1212SHE PWM Fan)
- Video: ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB GDDR5 (Catalyst 8.840.3.0)
- Drive 1: Corsair P64 SSD, 64GB
- Drive 2: Western Digital VelociRaptor WD1500HLFS 150GB 10000 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3Gb/s 3.5"
- Optical Drive: Sony NEC Optiarc AD-7190A-OB 20X DVD Burner
- Enclosure: CM STORM Sniper Gaming Case
- PSU: Corsair CMPSU-750TX ATX12V V2.2 750Watt
- Monitor: SOYO 24"; Widescreen LCD Monitor (DYLM24E6) 1920X1200
- Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate Version 6.1 (Build 7600)
1GB Single-Disk Test Results
The bottom line for any storage device is the combination of capacity and transfer speed. For a network attached storage server, the differences are all about the infrastructure that is placed around the basic HDD array. Since capacity is something that's easy to define and measure, the real question for any NAS product is how fast will it Read and Write data. For this reason, Benchmark Reviews measures NAS performance as the bandwidth achieved during a file transfer test. The first tests we perform utilize a single 1GB (1000 megabytes / 1,000,000,000 bytes) file in a transfer to and from the NAS.
Since we started testing NAS units exclusively with Win 7, there aren't as many prior test results to compare with. We'll try and build up the NAS testing as best we can in the next year. In the meantime, we can compare several units from QNAP that we have on hand now. With all the NAS units operating in single disk mode, all of the units have broadly similar performance. The TS-419P II comes in slightly ahead of the TS-219P+ on the 1 GB Read tests, primarily due to the faster CPU clock. The Intel-based (TS-x59) units pull ahead by a couple of MB/s, but it's nothing to get excited about. Most people don't care too much about single disk performance, but it's useful to get an understanding of any possible issues with the basic architecture of the system. In this case, none of them have issues, and they all turn in comparable performance numbers.
Moving on to the 1 GB write bandwidth test, our results suggest that while it may sometimes be faster to read files from a hard drive than it is to write files onto it, the opposite is true more often than not in a NAS appliance. The good news is that the TS-419P II turns in very strong numbers here, compared to the TS-219 P+, with the slower (1.6GHz) CPU. The TS-419P II splits the difference between the two-bay TS-219 P+ and the six-bay TS-659 Pro II pretty cleanly, showing a clear advantage for the faster (2.0 GHz) CPU in the new TS-x19P II series. The bad news is that the TS-419P II suffers from the same degraded performance that I observed when writing 1 GB files to the QNAP TS-259 Pro, with the standard MTU of 1500. We'll have to keep an eye out in the remaining tests to see if there is a consistent performance gap when Jumbo Frames are not enabled.
The thing that impresses me is how close these NAS results get compared to the internal transfer speed between an SSD and the 150 GB VelociRaptor, running directly off the motherboard chipset. Yes they are all slower, and the speed goes up with price, but for anyone who is used to USB 2.0 transfer speeds, or multi-drive towers using SATA port replication, these results are sure to offer a pleasing alternative.
Next up is 10 GB (1000 metric megabytes / 10,000,000,000 bytes) file transfer testing. Using the single-disk configuration in each NAS, and a single Gigabit connection, network throughput will be put to the test, and the effect of any system or hardware caches will be minimized.
10GB Single-Disk Test Results
Examining 10GB basic file transfer speeds, the QNAP TS-419P II delivers slightly better read performance than either of the two-bay units. These small differences aren't going to make anyone's day, but they do show a clear, steady evolution of NAS infrastructure performance as time goes on. The TS-219P+ even shows a small advantage over the older TS-259 Pro, but don't forget that several of the more advanced NAS applications are only compatible with Intel-based units and the TS-x19 units all run a Marvell CPU. The TS-659 Pro II is built to handle the higher throughput of a six-disk array; it has all the advantages, of course, and it shows! The TS-659 has some of the best transfer speeds we've ever encountered during our testing and the single disk results are actually comparable to the RAID 5 performance. Of course, you get none of the advantages of redundancy with a single disk or JBOD, so most NAS users will go for one of the RAID configurations.
In our 10GB write performance tests, the performance of the TS-419P II is the complete equal to the two Intel-based units, at least when using Jumbo Frames. However, just as we saw in the 1GB Write testing, the standard 1500 MTU setting really cripples the single-disk write performance with this unit. Even with that performance hit, the TS-419P II gets a major jump in performance compared to the TS-219 P+, with the slower CPU clock.
Next we're going to look at RAID 5 performance, where the TS-419P II will have to compete with one of its bigger, stronger brothers in the QNAP product line, the TS-659 Pro II. Since the QNAP TS-259 Pro and TS-219P+ don't support the RAID5 configuration that we normally use to test large format NAS products, we won't be able to include their results in this comparison.NAS Comparison Products
- QNAP TS-219P+ Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-259 Pro Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-659 Pro II Gigabit 6-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-419P II Gigabit 4-bay SATA NAS Server
1GB RAID 5 Test Results
If you've got more than three HDD spindle to put in play, it makes sense to use one of the more advanced RAID configurations. RAID 5 is one of the most popular setups, primarily due to the balance it exhibits between capacity and redundancy. Not surprisingly, most NAS units that can support more than three HDDs also support RAID 5, so it makes sense to use it for test purposes. Most NAS products that can support RAID 5 go beyond the minimum number of drive bays, to a total of four, so that is the number of drives that I typically use to test with, even though I could get by with only three.
The results for RAID 5 read testing are very similar to single disk testing, which is not a bad thing. Given all the behind-the-scenes processing that goes on to calculate parity bits, these results show that most QNAP Turbo NAS units have the necessary power under the hood to keep the drives performing at their highest potential during read operations. When using RAID 5, the TS-419P II outperformed all of the other NAS systems and itself, in single-disk operation. It also edged past the TS-659 Pro II running in RAID 5. Read performance is clearly very strong with this system, which is a real bonus if you use it as frontline storage. Using it primarily as a backup system, you want top-notch write performance, which we'll test next.
The 1 GB RAID 5 disk write test shows the typical shortfall, when compared with the single disk results. It's well known that RAID 5 write performance can be a weak point, with all the computation overhead involved and the extra parity bits that need to be calculated and written to each of the drives. The only way to overcome that is with raw computational horsepower, which is what the TS-659 Pro II brings to the table. It's a shame that the simplest task any NAS can perform is basic backup duty, and in order to do that well, you need to buy the most powerful system to effectively reap the benefits of a multi-disk array. The reduced write performance with 1500 MTU is also a factor in RAID 5, so it's looking more and more like Jumbo Frames (9000 MTU) should be the preferred network setting for this unit.
Next up is 10 GB (1000 metric megabytes / 10,000,000,000 bytes) file transfer testing. Using the 4-disk RAD 5 configuration in each NAS, and a single Gigabit connection, network throughput will be put to the test, and the effect of any system or hardware caches will be minimized.
10GB RAID 5 Test Results
Looking at read tests with a single 10GB file, the TS-419P II hangs a little tighter in the groove, but can't quite keep up with its big brother, the TS-659 Pro II. The TS-659 Pro II improved its performance when transferring large files, which I thought was interesting. It shows how this unit is built to carry the heavier data loads. The TS-419P II gained some performance as well, but not as much as the TS-659 did. There was a small decrease in performance with Jumbo Frames enabled, which is counter to the Write results. It's not significant enough to outweigh the performance deficits seen in the Write testing, though.
Looking at write tests with a single 10GB file, the TS-419P II still suffers from the typical RAID 5 write penalties due to the computing overhead required to deal with the parity bits. The various caches built into the system help out on the smaller file transfers, but they get filled up and lose their effectiveness when dealing with large files like this. Even the TS-659 Pro II loses some performance when handling super large files. Once again, the 1500 MTU results lag far behind the Jumbo Frames performance, so it's a definite recommendation to set up the network interface with 9000 MTU, if you can. Of course, that will affect all your other Ethernet interfaces, so make sure all your other network devices are not negatively impacted by using Jumbo Frames.
All in all, my impression of the test results is that the QNAP TS-419P II puts in a solid performance, especially considering the added flexibility it offers in terms of advanced RAID support. I would feel better served by using it for front-line storage instead of a primary backup device, and that is consistent with the evolving computing infrastructure that surrounds us in our everyday lives. A device like this offers ones of the best ways of staying connected with your data, wherever you are. As for backups, I prefer off-site storage anyway.
Now, let's take a closer look at the internal workings of the NAS, where we can see the individual activity of the CPU, memory, and network interface. It's these support subsystems that have a big influence on the overall system performance, as I can easily demonstrate.
NAS Comparison Products
- QNAP TS-219P+ Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-259 Pro Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-659 Pro II Gigabit 6-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-419P II Gigabit 4-bay SATA NAS Server
NAS System Overhead Measurements
I've discussed the potential impact the NAS hardware has on performance in general terms so far. The hard reality is that the CPU, drive controllers, memory, and network subsystems have a direct and profound impact on the throughput of a NAS device. In extreme cases where multiple drives (4+) are arranged in higher-order RAID configurations, the CPU has a ton of work to do, calculating parity bits and parsing them out to multiple data streams. In-line data encryption adds another potential load to the infrastructure, but I'm not going to bother testing that until I get a system with the recent AES-NI additions to the Intel64 instruction set. It's just not realistic to use encryption without that level of support. In this section, I'm going to look at some results from the System Monitor capability that is available on the QNAP Turbo NAS server.
Let's start off looking at CPU usage on the NAS server. During a straight data transfer from the PC to 4 disks configured as RAID 5 on the TS-419P II, the results show the Marvell 88F6282 SoC device completely maxed out at 100%. The two blocks in the chart represent two different sets of files being transferred, with a break between them. The first block represents ten 1GB files transferred by one Windows command, and you can see little dips where the CPU paused between each file. The second block represents one 10GB file, transferred the same way. Any dips in CPU utilization in this section are due to system wait states thrown in by some sub-system crying "Uncle" for a brief period of time. By and large, there's little difference between the two scenarios, except the single 10GB file is transferred over a little quicker.
The memory subsystem on the QNAP TS-419P II is not being taxed by these file transfers at all. Unless you plan to use the NAS for all of the "extra" things it can do, as a media server and such, don't worry about the fact that it only comes with 512MB of memory capacity. That's plenty, at least for the basic disk functions. This is very close to the same level of memory usage I saw on the two-bay device I tested , so there's no additional load presented to the memory by four disks in RAID 5, as compared to the single-disk configuration.
The network interface is getting more of a workout than the memory, but it is still running well below the throughput limits of the Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) interface. This particular chart was produced during two disk-writing tests, we'll see a difference with disk-read tests shortly. There's a lot of extra capacity here, even with one of the larger NAS devices, running multiple disks in RAID configurations with a single GbE connection. This TS-419P II unit, and most of the larger QNAP units, all have dual Ethernet connections that allow for teaming via IEEE 802.3ad/Link Aggregation, that in certain cases allows for almost double the network throughput. This is only going to be required in rare cases, where both systems connected this way have the raw transfer speed to make it necessary. That's the sort of thing you're only going to see in a corporate LAN room, at least for now. One day, I'm going to load up one of the big NAS units with high end SSDs in RAID 0 and let it rip; then we'll see where the system bottlenecks are.
The network throughput scales right along with the disk throughput, as seen here. In this test, I was reading from the NAS, instead of writing files to it. The increased data transfer rate from the disks translates to an increase in network throughput, up from about 55MB/s in write operations, to over 80MB/s in reading mode. In the following chart, you can also see the effect on the network load as a multi-file transfer operation takes place. Until now, we have been moving very large files around, but in the last portion of the chart below, I transferred a very large number of smaller files, just to see how that would impact performance. Instead of one 10 GB file, the green portion of the chart shows what happens when transferring 4,793 items totaling 6.5GB from the PC to the NAS. If you're going to use any NAS for basic backup duties, this is the kind of action it's going to see. Still, there should be no worries as far as network speed goes, no matter what the primary usage is.
In contrast, the NAS CPU is still being taxed during these file transfers, with either small numbers of large files or a large number of small files. In the third section of the chart below, you can see some additional dips, but they're sharp drops with a corresponding sharp recovery. There's nowhere for the CPU to hide in a high performance NAS appliance, and the ARM processor in QNAP's lower-priced models gets hammered pretty bad in typical use cases.
I hope this section showed you some objective reasons why the infrastructure that any NAS product brings to the table is important to its overall performance. As the number of drive bays goes up, the hardware requirements increase as well, and the price has to follow. I know it's disheartening to see that you don't get great economies of scale on the larger NAS units, but it would be even more of a shame if they didn't perform up to their true capabilities because the hardware was holding them back.
Now, let's look at some Final Thoughts, and then move on to our Conclusion and Product Ratings.
NAS Server Final Thoughts
My first and solemn duty is to remind everyone that relying on a collection of drives in any RAID configuration for data backup purposes is a huge error. RAID systems provide protection against loss of services, not loss of data. Several examples will illustrate the problem, I hope:
-
the drive controller goes bad and corrupts the data on all the drives in the array
-
the entire storage device is physically or electrically damaged by external forces
-
the entire storage device is lost, stolen, or destroyed
-
a single drive in a RAID 5 cluster dies and during the rebuild process, which puts higher stress on the remaining drives, a second drive fails
-
floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, etc. (AKA El Niño)
All these points lead to the inescapable conclusion that multiple drives in a common system, in a single location do not provide effective and reliable data backup. Throughout this review I've talked about high-availability systems, and the QNAP TS-419P II fits that description, especially when employed in a RAID 6 configuration. Even with two concurrent drive failures, your data is still available and accessible. The NAS device stays online the entire time while the failed drives are replaced and the array is rebuilt. That's what RAID systems are designed to do. The inherent redundancy is not meant to serve as a backup file set. A larger NAS with more drive bays offers the possibility of increasing the redundancy with RAID 5/6/50/60, but for a SOHO environment, RAID 5 is generally adequate. Remember, we're not talking about losing data here, we're only talking about the ability to keep working uninterrupted, if one drive should fail. If two or more drives fail, it's time to pull the local backups off the shelf.
I guess I was an early adopter, or at least I was in the early majority. I bought my first NAS in 2005, after my wife's Dell desktop shredded the first of several hard drives. While my NAS from the past has been sitting in one spot for most of those six years, the world of NAS products has not. New products available today offer so much more functionality and additional features that it boggles the mind. Most of the advances have been in the area of software, but the hardware has also kept pace. PATA became SATA; 10Mbps became dual Gigabit NICs with failover; "locked-in-a-box" (AKA: The Brick) became hot-swap RAID clusters; one button & one light became 4-line LCD displays. However you look at it, the range of capabilities available today looms high over what we had to choose from in the not too distant past.
I'm writing this article from a much different perspective than our Executive Editor. He runs an IT company and I support a small network for a home office. That being said, we both recognize the intrinsic value of network attached storage products. I bought my first one six years ago and it does automatic backups every night at midnight and 1:00 AM for the two primary workstations in the house. When I hear it light off at midnight, I know it's time to either finish my article or go to bed. Then the snooze alarm kicks off an hour later, if I'm still up. It performs well and looks stylish even today, if a bit outsized. It looks like this:
All of the QNAP TS series product in this article offer so much more capability than my old, simple NAS. Just as our small business has evolved, so too have the tools available. We're looking at creating a website and a blog to go along with it, and maybe a forum. All these can be hosted from one of these new versatile NAS devices, acting as a server. This kind of capability goes far beyond the simple remote access tools provided by Windows Home Server. Quite frankly, unless you are getting Windows Home Server for free from your MSDN account and you can repurpose an old computer that's sitting in the corner unused, all these NAS systems reviewed here on Benchmark Reviews are a much better value. If your Windows based server is only going to be used for serving out files, sharing printers and managing backups, one inexpensive NAS does all this at less than half the cost.
When you add in the new features that QNAP has added recently, like RAID 10, Real-time Remote Replication, ElephantDrive Cloud Storage, Download Station V2, MyCloudNAS Remote Access, and USB Wi-Fi Network Adapter Support, it's obvious that you get so much more with this solution package. The fact that you can get access to all these capabilities with an IT department is icing on the cake. The very fact that Microsoft offers four version of Windows Storage Server tells me that most end-users would be foolish to try and implement any of the MS solutions without professional services getting involved, at least for a portion of the selection and integration process.
So, what conclusions can we draw, particularly about this high performance, four-bay TS-419P II Turbo NAS server? Click NEXT to find out, and discuss...
QNAP TS-419P II Conclusion
Although the rating and final score mentioned in this conclusion are made to be as objective as possible, please be advised that every author perceives these factors differently at various points in time. While we each do our best to ensure that all aspects of the product are considered, there are often times unforeseen market conditions and manufacturer changes which occur after publication that could render our rating obsolete. Please do not base any purchase solely on our conclusion, as it represents our product rating for the sample received which may differ from retail versions.
The performance of the QNAP TS-419P II Turbo NAS server was very solid. The beefed up Marvell 88F6282 processor, which houses an ARM®v5TE Single Core CPU running at 2.0 GHz with a 256KB L2 Cache, made a measurable difference in performance compared to the 1.6 GHz version in the TS-219P+. QNAP stuck with SATA 3Gb/s and USB 2.0 interfaces on this unit; and the former is a non-issue. Those of us, who have experienced the much-needed shot in the arm the latest generation of serial busses provides for interfacing with portable devices, will be left longing for more. The two eSATA ports on the back panel allow external units with that interface to run at full speed, compensating somewhat for the USB performance gap. The best read performance I recorded for the TS-419P II was 97 MB/s, and the best write speed was 89 MB/s, which are both very good, but not outstanding. The additional load encountered with RAID 5 operation was not handled as easily as it was in the Intel-based units I've tested, and the write results in RAID 5 were nowhere near the single disk results, with a maximum transfer rate of 57 MB/s.
The larger, four-bay form factor of the QNAP TS-419P II allows for the use of a display on the front of the unit, which was handy for quick adjustments and for out-of-the-box setup before connecting it to the network. The status LEDs for activity on: HDD1-4, LAN, USB and eSATA were helpful to verify what was going on with the unit. Ditto for the flashing indicators and audible status alarms, they were mostly intuitive and I needed just a brief look at the manual to make sure I understood the signals correctly. The exposed portion of the drive trays are nicely finished and blend well with the remainder of the front panel. Three different shades and textures of black can look busy if arranged poorly, but this NAS looks the business. The side and top panel is a one-piece titanium colored section with a fine grained brush finish. The brighter finish adds a bit of elegance to the visual design, plus it doesn't show fingerprints. IMHO, it fits in perfectly with its intended environment, the small office or a sophisticated home office.
The construction quality of the TS-419P II exceeds that of many computer-based appliances. The data center crews are all hardware junkies for the most part, and they like their gear to radiate superiority. QNAP takes the level of excellence that is required to win over that finicky community and applies it across the product line. Enjoy the trickle-down effect where you can, even if it's from the data centers on Wall St. and not the banks on Wall St. Every QNAP product I've ever used had the same attention to build quality, even the lower-priced units.
The QNAP TS-419P II Turbo NAS network storage server is best suited to a very tech-capable SOHO organization that can take full advantage of all the capabilities and functions it offers. The applications are well designed and documented, to the point where most resident geeks can handle setup and administration of even the most advanced capabilities. There's a lot of functionality that's important in a business environment, but the availability of more broad-based web applications is also impressive, with support for several consumer focused cloud-based services being a simple example. The QMobile app for handheld devices, to stream music, digital pictures, and videos from a QNAP NAS server directly to your mobile device, is another. Most of these consumer oriented features are easier to configure than the hardcore IT apps, like VMware and iSCSI, plus the documentation provided by QNAP is excellent.
The QNAP TS-419P II Turbo NAS server is more suited for the SOHO environment, but its size, performance and features could certainly fill a spot in the corporate enterprise market. The smaller two drive bay devices included in this test only allow for RAID-0 or RAID-1, and that's not enough for many small businesses, even though it may be all you need for the home office. Before we discuss the pricing in detail, remember that these systems are not discretionary items for most businesses, they are a necessary expense. The inevitable costs for not having a robust data management system in place are 10-100 times higher than any of the prices you will see in this paragraph. As of October 2011 the TS-419P II model was listed at Newegg for $549.99. If you need the wealth of features and the higher RAID performance the top TS-x59 Turbo NAS series provides, and roughly the same amount of storage space, the $959.99 is a possible choice at $959.99. Home users will probably feel more comfortable with the Marvell-based QNAP TS-219P+ at $299.99 for basic tasks.
Benchmark Reviews has enjoyed testing all of these QNAP network storage solutions, and with the wide range of products on offer from them, anyone in need of a NAS server can find one to fit their current and future needs. The biggest problem is choosing one - Newegg has nine 4-disk units listed in stock currently, just from QNAP. That's why we go into so much detail in our reviews, to help you figure out what level of performance and features is right for you. The TS-419P II Turbo NAS server seems like another strong option for the SOHO market, especially for front-line storage. A few may need something simpler, and others may need more storage space, but the four-bay TS-419P II fills a big spot in the important middle ground.
Pros:
+ 97 / 89 MBps best read/write performance
+ System software is SOTA and continually updated
+ Support Apps available for multiple cloud services
+ Support App available for Mobile access
+ VMware Ready iSCSI for virtualization deployments
+ Online RAID Capacity Expansion and Level Migration
+ Hot-swap RAID storage
+ Dual Gigabit Ethernet with teaming and failover
+ RAID 0/1/5/6/10/JBOD disk configurations
+ Two eSATA ports for additional storage expansion
+ Low power consumption
+ High quality construction
Cons:
- Write speeds in RAID 5 still limited by the installed computing power
- USB 3.0 ports not included, only USB 2.0
- A few advanced capabilities will be too daunting for a novice SOHO user
- Many consumer HDDs not suitable for RAID, and enterprise units are $$$
Ratings:
- Performance: 9.25
- Appearance: 9.00
- Construction: 9.50
- Functionality: 9.00
- Value: 8.75
Final Score: 9.1 out of 10.
Excellence Achievement: Benchmark Reviews Golden Tachometer Award.
Benchmark Reviews encourages you to leave comments (below), or ask questions and join the discussion in our Forum.
Related Articles:
- G.Skill RipJaws DDR3-1600 CL7 Memory Kit
- Sapphire Radeon HD 4770 CrossFireX Performance
- OCZ Core Series SATA-II SSD OCZSSD2-1C64G
- Mad Catz S.T.R.I.K.E. 7 Gaming Keyboard
- NETGEAR R6300 Gigabit Wi-Fi Router
- Seagate Barracuda 3TB Hard Drive ST3000DM001
- AMD A10-5800K Trinity Desktop Processor
- ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe/WD mini-ITX Motherboard
- OCZ Vertex EX SLC SSD OCZSSD2-1VTXEX120G
- ASUS GeForce GTX 285 Matrix Video Card

The NAS provides Web File Manager for you to easily download, upload, and manage the files on the server by web browser.
Comments
The TS-419P II is a well designed software solution with a wealth of functionality. The case is well made and looks great but uses yesterday's processing hardware. Why USB V3.0, Dual CPU and SATA6 are missing is a turn off for me. SATA6 is probably of little value but it's the industry trend with disk drives and may prove useful in the future. Intel hardware is a plus for me.
USB 3.0 and SATA 6Gb/s are all available on the more high-end QNAP servers. I don't know of any Dual CPU units made by anyone, but if you mean dual-CORE, then that's also available on the pricier units. Most of the "Pro" models have the Dual-Core Intel® Atom? (1.80 GHz) in them. The really hardcore models have a Quad Core Intel Xeon E3-1225 at 3.1GHz Processor or a Dual Core Intel® Core? i3-2120 Processor at 3.3 GHz.
The software on this unit looks great and has a lot of functionality and great access ability.
For the average home user with a decent amount of tech knowledge, working within a win7 environment at home but an iPhone/iPad on the road what would be better; windows home server or a product like this? And in your opinion would building a box myself with better parts( processor, memory) bet the better option?
Yes, I meant dual core, I know better. I would be happy with an Intel 2120, but never an Atom anything.
Disk drives sure jumped in price due to unfortunate weather!
Keith,
If the sofware was offered separately, the answer would be easy. I'm in much the same position as you. I don't like the processing capability until the price is more than I want to spend.
I totally agree with you. I will probably break down and pay the higher price for improved processing because the software is impressive!
I just now ordered the TS-659 Pro II. Didn't get everything I wanted but got everything I could afford. I will have a toy to play with tomorrow. I should have purchased the TS-659 Pro+ because it's a much better buy, but common sense failed.
What is your intended use(s)?
- Music/movie streaming
- Backup
- Central storage
- Near future hosting my own website
What's the price difference - about $100, right?
Now, the OTHER thing you get as you spend more mony is WRITE speed. Take a look at QNAPs published write speeds:
Write Performance (MB/s) - Dual-Core Atom: 107, Single-Core Atom: 88, Marvell 2.0GHz: 75, Marvell 1.6GHz: 45
This has a direct impact on yur backup speeds, although the laptops may be the limiting factor anyways, if they have the typical 5400 RPM HDDs in them. They use less power, so it's quite common to use them instead of the 7200 RPM models.
The other thing you get for your $$ is USB 3.0. This may not have any impact on your intended usage, but for some, USB 2.0 is a deal-breaker.
Of course, you also know that QNAP released a couple new models at CES, right. I tell you, I can't keep up with them... LOL
Bottom line, like Anna above, I think your expectation for backup performance is the key discriminator here. That's the primary area (of the ones you listed), where spending more will get you more.
Presently I don't need the virtualization features.
Are the new models announced at CES listed in their site? I would assume so, as their site indicates the 459 Pro II as a new model.
And thanks for the link below.
qnap.com/images/products/comparison/Comparison_4BayNAS.html
I first saw it on the box then when I opened and looked at the back of the unit, two of the ports are labeled USB3.0 The quick start guide also says USB3. This is very odd since their website and all reviews say only USB2.0
I do not know if the new units are shipping with USB 3 or is it Canadian versions. I am in Canada. Anyways I am thrilled. This unit offers so much for the price.
Usually when the "Manufacturer reserves the right to update the product specifications" it's to take cost out of the product.